4k remux vs encode. That's not a remux, but is an encode.

4k remux vs encode. MKV and MP4 are just containers.

4k remux vs encode Also keep in mind that sometimes files have to be encoded a certain way depending on the device you're playing back on (For example, playing back an mkv directly on an LG OLED requires DTS audio and Dolby Vision video to be remuxed to play correctly) My main question is it smarter to just take the blow and keep the large 4k remux files after ripping? Or encode them with say and nvidia card? Fortunately, I am flexible here. Up until now, all I needed to do was wait for a 1080p Remux version of a movie, and if that would never come, I would get a 1080p AMZN release. Debating between 4K Remux vs Encode as I'm in between upgrading some of my encode to remuxes and wondering if I should upgrade my entire collection or just some How do y'all decide which type to collect for what type of movies? Which ones benefit most from this higher bitrate TrueHD and DTS-HD audio are unmatched. A Scene Encode 2160p (with a smaller size) - Like with the same movie the Bluray REMUX is 91GB, but say a TIGOLE or NAHOM encode with a size of say 25-29 GB or maybe even 15-16GB or 16. Let's say I want to create my OWN movie encode. Checking dark frames, and motion frames too and don't see a difference in detail. Whether or not you’ll be able to tell a difference depends on the quality of your setup. is there a huge difference x265 is an encoded 4K BluRay. they're libraries used to encode to a codec (h264 or h265). 4k remux vs x265 encode bitrate question . 1080p remux could be anywhere from 15gb-40gb. Best 4k encodes vs remux for my setup Hey guys, so I'm setting up my plex server and I've been looking at torrents for 4k movies and I'm wondering what would be best, I dont have tons of storage and I'm seeing remuxes that are a lot of GB obviously then I'm seeing some encodes that are in the 20gb range but I've heard about 'tigole' being great which is quite low GB also. The good quality + lower space taken up is an attractive option. That's not a remux, but is an encode. Godzilla vs Kong: 4K HDR Blu Ray remux 43,6 GB vs 4K HDR 10+ BluRay rip 5,39 GB? Question I have a Samsung QN90A Neo Qled 55 Inch and can only display HDR 10 and HDR 10+. Some torrented files are full 4K Bluray quality, others are compressed down. Looks like you just want to If you are using other tools like Premiere Pro to encode the video due to some plugins I need, is there a way thru FFMpeg to add HDR10 metadata to the H. Publication date 1971-07-24 Topics Godzilla, Hedorah, Kaiju, Toho, Yoshimitsu Banno Language Japanese Item Size 19. a complete 1to1 ripped from a BluRay that hasn't been reencoded. Assuming the encode is x264 thats very low bitrate for 4k. These movies are typically around 40-60gb, or even larger depending on the movie. However, some people don't have the luxury of space, whether digitally or physically to store remux media. As far as 4K remuxes go, whether it was shot in 2K and upscaled to 4K or if it was shot 4K completely, you’ll benefit greatly by HDR. As alternative, I can download the Web-DL with DD+ Atmos. I watch on an OLED as well in a home theater setup. They will either be in AVC or VC- 1 codecs which is what Blu-ray was originally encoded with. At half the size too. The high quality 4k bluray encode is about I'm fully aware and fully understand the whole argument of "CPU encoding is better". These are the settings that seem most important (as far as I know): AV1 vs. I balked at buying UHD BD players. REMUX 4K videos are still going to be like 40GB, so that's still only 200 movies on a drive? If I add a TV series thats going to take up so much of my Remuxes all the way my friend. If 1080p remux's had HDR i would save space and not get the 4k version. Releases that doesn't have the Remux or FULL BLU-RAY tag would be an encode of the Remux Well first off, remux shouldn’t be in x264. Most remuxes i've watched keep these black bars and therfore the screen isnt being properly utilised - you'll get I've been lurking in r/plex, r/hometheater, and r/homelab for a while, and I am looking for advice and resource recommendations on building a Plex setup that will give me 4k, HDR, super-saiyan, lossless or near-loss quality streams, possibly with the option to transcode down for remote users. Remux movie is 49. So a BluRay release without the 'remux' tag means that the media has been reencoded and there is loss of quality, while 'remux' means it is lossless. It varies by your eyes, your display, the content, the encode and what you tolerate. What is looked down upon, as severely degrading the quality, are encodes that use the BRRip as a source because then you have three cycles of lossy encoding (digital master->remux->BRRip>new encode) Lastly, there is no such thing as "optimally compressed". Reply I have 5 x 8TB HDDs. Private torrent sites will have them. Now that I have a 4K TV, there more options, so I don't know what to do. 1 or Minimal to no difference in almost all cases. If you change Media Info's view from Tree to Text, scroll sideways along the Encode Settings list, and you will eventually see the method of encoding. There's usually little quality benefit to all the extra storage space used. There's usually two types of "lossless" rips. I used to reencode my blue rays now I leave them as remux and my 4k I always try to keep remux Filesize: Remux = 1GB vs. ” It also requires more processing power and time compared to remuxing. I'd upgrade to the best x900(XT) CPU your board supports. I now have to choose between keeping files in 4K or converting to 1080p and then what quality profile to use. I'd go for the large encode. 3. It will say either rc= crf (with the crf Encodes aren't always bad, this was just a bad encode. on the other hand, the smaller 265/264 files appear to be smoothing Remuxing is very different from encoding. 2. Hedorah (1971) 4K UHD Encode + Eng Subs by Toho Co. Ad for the REMUX or encode, it depends. The file size of compressed versions from a lot of the scene releases are obscenely large and absolutely unwarranted. 2160p. Ps. a high quality encode. I don't notice much of a difference between 25gb 4k compressed or remux copies. Size will be comparable to an actual Blu-Ray remux. Using this, I end up a DV 07. such as 4K or HDR content, where even minor compression Depends on the source of the Web-DL and the encode. If you have a solid tv and a great sounbar, you could use the REMUX. The important part here is remux vs not remux but you may see x264/x265 more common to indicate an encode, and remux. The "high end" can be argued. Hate to muddy the waters but most 1080p files use the old h264 encoding, whereas most 4k files use the I rip/remux both the 4k disc and the 1080p disc, especially since not every movie has a superior 4k release imo and my projector only interpolates 1080p nor is it perfect at hdr. But the example you gave is a high quality x265 and the file size shows that. If you see a 2160p x265 encode movies that's only like 1GB, run away. In general, if you encode anything, and want Would the quality of a 4K Blu ray played through a Blu Ray Player connected to a Receiver be better than a 4k Remux file played on an Nvidia Shield Let Handbrake encode, with the resulting file being HDR10 recognized. Best part is I can use mkvtoolnix to take the lossless atmos or DTS:X track and add it to my 1080p br remux and set it as the new default. 10bit. Your second example with the low bitrate is also not a remux. Remux it all together. The Blu-ray was much better. Another big thing I've noticed for encode vs remux is aspect ratios. You’re Probabaly transcoding the video. Indeed, on my current 55" 4k Samsung TV, I can't see a difference at ~7ft, so I just go for the encodes. Question Hello guys, I just bought my first 4K TV (LG OLED65C9) and I want to start getting some 4K movies. In the case I ONLY have the 'x265 4K web-DL' option. - For me its because of his encode quality vs the size. I don’t see a difference in remux tv shows vs a good encode. How many 4K REMUX movies will you be able to take? To answer the question, a 4K REMUX will generally be around 50+ GB. Both are processes in video editing, but both serve different functions. None. If you have a Roku TV and your streaming from a Plex app don't bother with 4K remux Dithered down web rips = cheap TV, sound bar setup Common setup but not meant REMUX vs Encoded BluRay? Question So I'm getting an OLED soon and it's given me an excuse to catch up on some movies I've been meaning to watch. On smaller screens - 42” and less you may not notice the difference. say which source it is per the rules but recently I found the amazon web-dl of the show was far better than the bluray-remux. on the other hand, the smaller 265/264 files appear to be 20TB storage server/ 4K Remux vs 4K Encode Hi I currently have a server with around 20TB storage and want to upgrade some of my movies to 4K but want the quality to be great, I have a 55 inch 4K samsung tv and usually sit about 5-7 feet away from it. 480p>720p>1080p>2160p(4k) Remux is an untouched BluRay. If it's 4k, MA / amazon VOD then 4k framestor / wildcat remux, no 4k encodes for me. Hope this helps you. Most 4K is upscaled (especially when cgi heavy) from the source anyway so its really the hdr that adds the deep color and contrast to make the pq look far superior to the sdr when done right. UHD 1080p Encodes from reputable groups are downsampled encode of 4K HDR/SDR Blurays with aim to have transparent encode with benefits of HDR and are better looking than regular 1080p Definitely the 4K version, the Blu-ray release from 2010 should be avoided at all costs and the 2008 release is OOP and quite dated but still the better of the two Blu-ray releases. LG 55CX / Denon AVR-X2400H / Q Acoustic 2050's + 2000C + 2070S + 2020's / Sony BDP-S5200 (Region A) / Panasonic DP-UB450EB / Nvidia SHIELD 16Gb / Xbox Series X / PS5 Remuxes all the way my friend. I can download GoT as 4K Blu Ray Remux (with lossless Atmos, which I really appreciate) with 25 GB/Ep on UHD movies. But when it comes to 4K, things (mainly storage) start to change your perspective. What's everyone's preference for content where a 4K REMUX isn't available because it was never released for that particular item. MKV and MP4 are just containers. The 4k Even on my 42 inch tv, I couldn't tell them apart. MA. Question I'm looking at 2 files, one of them is a REMUX which is 140GB and the other is x265 less than 10GB. 39 GB, while the same movie in 2160p. 06 recognized file. 4. REMUX. The Yify version has less fine details and you could see clear compression artefacts in fast moving and dark scenes. you're asking what the difference between euros and eggs is. One thing to note is that these are Webrips and not remuxes of the actual disc. UHD. use that. Inject the cropped rpu file with a new encoded cropped file. I was wondering, is there much of a difference between let's say a 70gb remux compared to something like a decent 20-30gb encoded bluray rip? What is better between an encoded bluray 4k vs a web 4k Honestly I've rarely seen a difference in a remux vs. How does the quality compare to a 4k scene encode? Obviously WEB-DL won't approach the retail HEVC streams like you would find on a disc (or in an ISO/remux copy). On the other hand, scene/p2p don't have any bandwidth constraints so they can focus only on quality. 9/10 it will look better than it’s 1080p counterpart. ). Don’t know about the other groups. Remux means the data has been copied (often simply to a new container like mkv) without any changes. I disagree with the efficiency of encoding bit. At first I believed I was getting fake uploads or something, but it seems to be a pattern. I would go for the REMUX, maybe delete some after, or buy extra storage. Not upscaled 4k. Any time you re-encode a blu-ray, (which is what a Rip is) you will get some amount of compression artifacts and light banding. 4K HDR x265 vs 4K x264 . The consensus seems to be that good encodes are pretty much identical/"transparent" to a Blu Ray remux for most people. HDR. Ltd. Will you upgrade your set-up in the future? Storage is getting cheaper every year and technology also improves. And I cannot detect a difference either on my LG 77" CX OLED or 140" JVC 4K projector (or my 4K computer display for that matter) even when standing up close to the screen swapping back and forth really quick between the Remux and encode and pixel peeping. 1-FGT Interstellar. I I'm no longer as concerned with the encoding times, so I'm looking for what settings are most important to preserve quality and lower file size. On a 65” 4K OLED at the viewing distance I sit at I can definitely tell the difference. The difference is less noticable at 4K 10mb/s, but will probably still have some compression in dark scenes whereas the 1080p 25mb/s would look much better in these conditions. HEVC. You just have to check the file size. 5MB/s Bitrate. Download encode and remux and find out if you can tell the difference. 265 file without re-encoding? A remux is by definition not an encode and comparing different remux versions would, I believe, be a largely pointless exercise. . FFmpeg is the leading multimedia framework, able to decode, encode, transcode, mux, demux, stream, filter and play pretty much anything that humans and machines have created. You just put it into a 320kbps box. The basic REMUX (main movie is ripped losslessly) and then a rip that copies all the contents of the disc as it's broken down and contained on that disc (these rips include bonus content and previews/commercials and for some releases that also means individual scenes are separated instead of compiled into a single file for a movie All, I’ve been deliberating over this ever since I got usenet and got access to easy downloads of 70-80gb 4k remuxes. Even your NVENC result is suspiciously slow. :D remux has the highest It means they’ve taken the video and audio from a 4K Bluray disc and converted it to mkv format without any re-encoding. Good encodes crop the video to remove the black bars which means they can properly be viewed using plex, etc. The second pert is the code used to compress the video. EDIT: I know they both have 4K releases but 4K took longer to be available and its not consistent yet, some movies have no 4k release, I dont have a 4K display yet so I can't compare it on my own. I have heard I do notice the quality difference between a remux and a good encode - hence I still opt for remuxes. I have decided that the quality difference is not worth the increase in space. A streaming service is trying to optimize bandwidth usage and overall customer satisfaction w/ quality. 03 GB. Encoding lossy->lossy, will throw away much smaller file sizes compared to Remux most releases are WEB H265 For example, a 2160p. Even anime encodes that "improve" with deband filters, only require them due to being encodes in the first place. If it's a reasonably high bitrate encode vs a remux, sure. Another thing is that it's a hard choice sometimes between web-dl with Dolby Vision and a regular 1080p remux. With an encode, you will virtually always see a long list of Encode settings, example - cabac=1 / ref=3 / deblock=1:0:0 / analyse=0x3:0x113 / me=umh / subme=9 etc. GPU's have encoders that are designed specifically to do decoding and encoding fast at the expense of quality and compression efficiency. So it has lost quality, if you want to go for the best use the REMUX version. x265. I do not know if this is right, but just wanted to know you guys's input on An encoder wrote this in their nfo for a 1080p encode for a recent movie, comparing the blu ray with a 4k WEB-DL: The film has a lot of dark scenes, 4k web source has better PQ, especially in dark and flat areas, and less bandings and blockings, and also there are more details in 4k web source, and bd is vague in many details and scenes, so I chose and encode from web source. HDR in my opinion is a greater improvement to the movie than Godzilla vs. I have a rtx 3000 series gpu, a powerful cpu, gigabit internet and an Nvidia shield which is what I will be streaming the content from my plex server to. ACC/VC-1/HEVC more to indicate the remux. Though, depending on the source and encode type bit depth may be lost. DTS-HD. I ended up keeping the mkvcage because it was smaller, and I don't have much space. If storage space is a concern then you should probably skip remuxes and grab encodes. My plan is Remux movies only and great encodes for tv shows. Maybe if I did stills but who knows. All of my blurays are re-encoded with Handbrake (I'm now re-encoding w/ H265 @ 10-bit which provides superior quality with reduced banding, and re-encode all non-Atmos and non-DTS:X audio tracks using AAC at high quality), so my average file is between 5GB - 8GB per movie. Handbrake does not Remux MKV or MP4. I always thought encodes are compressed versions of the remux, but I have been reading that 4K encodes are not noticeable from 4K remuxes. Most encodes online that I've seen specify the source type in the title and encoding formats in the information. SWTYBLZ i’ve had decent luck with, pretty good quality for a 4K encode. In the case I The remuxes have extreme noise that’s really distracting and actually discards some of the depth information of the scene. If you have a 4K HDR TV like LG CX or C2 OLED, almost always get Blu-ray encodes due to how they handle the color space and actually The biggest area I see quality problems is movies with lots of dark scenes as you really see the artifacts even with fairly good quality files. There are a lot of knobs that can be turned when turning a Remux into a x265 encode. If its x265 and the 1080p encode is x264 then maybe consider the 4k but thats still pretty low. If you’re using a remux, both 1080p and 4K will be FAR better than what Netflix can deliver. x265 is an encoded 4K BluRay. I've been outside the encode scene for a while, but before, it was usually removing grain or adding sharpening. The 1080p would also provide a better picture at 4K when upscaled. Media Info will show you. For example I watched thor ragnarok from a lossless remux vs his encode (just testing) on a 55 4k tv and honestly at where i was setting i couldn't notice a difference. Cropped and encoded from the JP The YAS-207 Yamaha Soundbar does specify for the DTS output. Reply reply [deleted] • Hmm, ok I’ll try to cut out a 5-10 minute slice of a UHD REMUX and encode that down and post the logs later tonight. Will I see any difference in quality between the remux and the encode? Interstellar. I acknowledge that others want the best of the best but I've had zero issues with what I'm watching. SOLUTION : [Blu-ray Ripping & Reading Metadata] Here's the Solutions, a step by step guide on how to encode a 4k Blu-ray to 1080p and still retain the Dolby goodness. Since plex does not transcode INTO x265, your 4k video will be transcoded down Debating between 4K Remux vs Encode as I'm in between upgrading some of my encode to remuxes and wondering if I should upgrade my entire collection or just some How do y'all Definitely the 4K version, the Blu-ray release from 2010 should be avoided at all costs and the 2008 release is OOP and quite dated but still the better of the two Blu-ray releases. Non-DV H265 is encoded ~12MB/s for video DV Encodes are ~24 MB/s With the increase bitrate, quality should be better maintained within. You want to use CPU for the best results. I really want to know if which 1080p rips have better visuals on a 4K display and if its not that big of a difference, PSA will do because of the Unless the source has some problems like dirty pixels and banding, and the encoder fixes them, the remux is always best. For example remux 4k weights like 60 gb and has around 60 mbit bitrate, I found good encodes x265 4k dv+hdr10 with 32 mbit How would you rate the quality of Remux/Encodes vs original BR in %? From my testings there's no noticeable difference between the BR disc, the Remux and the Encode. The only difference was different patterns of grain on the borders of object. If you decide to encode, make sure you are using proper settings: No copy+paste or default will archive your stuff properly. Tigole - If You have a 40"+ Android TV or PC monitor, this re-encoder is the Shizz. 1 Generally, using a GPU to handle conversions of permanent files is frowned upon. I am running some tests to get a feel for size and quality of each, but I like to optimize things. “Remux” is derived from the words “remix” and “multiplex. Assuming for a second that I am an acceptable good encoder would it be the final encode, JUST in terms of quality (CPUtime is NOT relevant), much distant from the Remux-generated one ??? Thank you very much. Step 1 is to not download the 4k light junk in your first example. I always try and get the full remux if possible however this isn't an option for these, at least not at the moment. I have a 4K HEVC remux which I would like to scale down to 1080p, but without loosing any quality, yet be AVC rather than HEVC. The remuxes have extreme noise that’s really distracting and actually discards some of the depth information of the scene. Don't get me wrong, go with remux if you can or really want to. Remuxing is the process of moving the content of a video from one container to another, which will Depending on the client and subtitle type, enabling subtitles may cause video transcoding. The i5 12600K has the excellent UHD770 QSV chip allowing for ~8-10 simultaneous 4K remux h265 dec to h264 enc @ 5-15Mbit/sec with tone mapping. You have two encoding cycles (digital master->remux->BRRip). Happy to be corrected here but if you’re looking for remuxes for ultimate archival quality then you should find these unedited copies are identical, irrespective of who the release group is. It will read as 320kbps, but it won't sound Ok I’ll update the post, yes it’s a Blu-ray remux vs sayyyy a 4k streaming copy since that’s most common (4k Netflix, Amazon, apple). This means that human subjects cannot tell the difference (or will not give a higher rating) to clips encoded at higher bitrates. I want to know if the difference between a remux file and a rip is that big or if I should go for the file with HDR 10+? A rip (especially that size) means it's probably I would say in general I'd trust scene/p2p to make higher quality encoding choices than a streaming service. As for the HDR part, both use HDR (as you said) so your theather set-up must be able to handle it. 5. I have been taking 4k remux, 4k encodes, 1080 remux and 1080 encodes and comparing quality by pixel peeping and watching and comparing while 6 feet away from the tv. Wish that 4k blurays were a standard for all movies but it is what it is. This is WAYYY too big for my little server (2-4TB right now). 7G . If you use any CRF above 12, then you obviously care about storage space and must accept detail loss. Yes, Because "better than remux" is typically subjective, when you assume the source is the gold standard. It will be a 1080p encode. I am setting up a FileFlow to auto-encode remux video files to my own settings (removing black bars, foreign languages, ect. h265 (10 Best 4K REMUX Release Groups? See the recent Love Actually 2160p REMUX release from FraMeSToR vs CiNEPHiLES as an example. I tend to keep this as a separate copy, so I end up with an HDR10 and DV versions. REMUX: A rip of Blu-ray or HD DVD disk to another container format or just stripping the disc of menus and bonus material while keeping the contents of its audio and video streams intact, guaranteeing the exact 1:1 movie quality as on original disk. I think 10GB for a 2 hour movie in 4k is a good encode (so 20 for that 4 hour runtime). WEB. My entire library is 4k UHD and 1080p BR rips. That also depends if the 1080p remux has the same source as the 2160 encode, 1080p might be I did the comparison a few years back with the last terminator movie to see how a Yify encode looked next to the 4K Blu-ray Remux. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Am I insane, for often (always?) preferring the 1080p REMUX to a 2160p / 4K Web-DL? There are more variables than that, such as encoding settings. I would like to build a server with ~50 TB of RAID storage to handle this with whatever Best 4k encodes vs remux for my setup . 2014. But even if you are viewing on a top notch tv, a remux and a large encode would have no difference visually. They encode from BD Remux, so quality is good, plus, like your Chest hair, there's always extras included in the encode. The only difference would be if author left out audio tracks and subtitles from the remux. This is 7GB/Ep. BluRay is simply the media source. I just went from a 1080 priojector to a sony 4k 65 inch tv. REMUX is definitely something for the long run. Grainy scenes and dark scenes are hardest to encode well, animated scenes are easiest to encode and can literally be 100x smaller with no visual difference. Depends if you want to have something for the long run or not. The sheet seems to prioritize quality of remuxes and encodes above all else; encoding to a lower file size with noticeable quality loss (however small) is kind of antithetical to the whole thing, which is QxR would A blu-ray remux will always be higher quality than anything re-encoded. But movies I can tell a huge Pastebin your encoding log, <1 fps seems low even for 4K x265 on a 2600. UHD if you have a decent 4K TV w/ HDR. A raw video stream without compression wouldn't be feasible for media consumption. Which would still amount to ~550GB of space Web-DL has - Worse image quality than 4k Remux Yeah if you download certain 4k remux it will be a file format (mkv) that the player will not be able to play for that I recommend using emby You can record something with a tinnny Nokia and encode it as 320kbps, but that doesn't mean it sounds like 320kbps. The Blu-ray itself is already (almost always) a loss of quality from the original source recording, so I don't see the point in storing a 20 - 50 GB file when an 8 - 15 GB file will rival the quality at The difference between REMUX that is 85Gb and 3 GB encode is the bitrate. Proper Encode = ~450MB If you need to save some space you should encode. But of course, the world is big and there are a lot of people. Unless it's 4K Material you probably have enough storage. I'm wanting to take 4k Remux files with TrueHD 7. BluRay. In this case the x265 Question about 4K WEB-DL vs 1080p Remux . However, re-encoding offers greater control over the video and audio quality, allowing users to fine-tune the output to their specific needs. So now that that's out of the way lets move on to hardware only encoding and what to do to get the best results. Next time only download one. Those sources would be called remuxs and they are 45-80gb for a 4K remux. But apples to apples, it would then depend on how you watch the 1080p is the resolution. h264 10-bit vs. Use the Multiplexer option of MKVToolNix to remux in the previously demuxed second video stream in to the new HDR10 file just transcoded. I u wont be able to tell the difference on high end tv if you go with higher bitrate encode vs remux. Encode video with the same crop offset as the original untouched rpu file. I guess the BEST source in my use case will be the Remux for obvious reasons. Obviously a bigger 4K screen can bring out the flaws in a 23 votes, 15 comments. Plex can deliver 4K Blu-ray Rips that are near native Blu-ray quality. 4K remux quality is pretty rare on sites i use What's everyone's preference for content where a 4K REMUX isn't available because it was never released for that particular item. With that said, a solid 1080p encode can be damn good and basically transparent, but I never know if a given encode will be, so I go with the remux. The good news about adding/changing audio is it is very light vs re-encoding video - a few mins tops per film for TRUE-HD to AC3 for example - and in the case of the AC3 track already being there . H265 is 18. are from very reputable releasers, and are probably the best youll get without a massive size jump. Reason being, if a 4K equivalent source for a particular movie exists, whether that's film or digital, then the existing 1080p versions (blu ray, digital whatever) have already been created from that higher resolution source. Certainly the most expensive. Question I recently bought a 4K TV and I have a question. Question With some of these web-dls coming out at about 25 Mbps, we are approaching 1080p Bluray bitrates, albeit with a different codec. h264 vs. Where is the best place to find them. Hey guys, so I'm setting up my plex server and I've been looking at torrents for 4k movies and I'm wondering what would be best, I dont have tons of storage and I'm seeing remuxes that are a lot of GB obviously then I'm seeing some encodes that are in the 20gb range but I've heard about 'tigole' being The consensus seems to be that good encodes are pretty much identical/"transparent" to a Blu Ray remux for most people. I think hdr is the key to quality and makes even an encode worth watching over a 1080p remux. MP3), then you'll be discarding data as part of the encoding process. I could clearly tell the difference. But apples to apples, it would then depend on how you watch the I always prefer REMUXES over any encode, anyday. No, 1080p scales cleanly into 4k so it should be fine. I personally would always prefer a 1080p blu-ray remux over a 4k Rip. AVC(x264) is less efficient than HEVC(x265) by roughly half. And you probably won't be able to tell the difference between the Remux and a 4k reencode if you're needing to ask about it. 4k Web-dl vs 4k scene encode . quality. Hi, im thinking of upgrading some of my downloaded movies to 4k and im wondering if i should go for the remux versions or the encoded versions? im seeing remux versions at 50-70GB and other options there for 15-25GB and i dont want to be able to notice a dip in quality and the hdr being off especially if im upgrading to 4k for the better quality and hdr. I remux-rip all my 4KUHD discs and play through a NAS PLEX on Shield/FireTVs. Tombdoc - Poor Man's TIgole, but if you are after Hollywood Question on REMUX vs x265 Codec . ildxqe dgardq njvphrnl ewjsw ipb xaobn nwxqj hqurpn nxdl ybbkpe